您现在的位置是:主页 > 永利真人手机端app > 操場埋尸案維持原判央視離正義又近了一步死刑正當程序

操場埋尸案維持原判央視離正義又近了一步死刑正當程序
2020-01-11 18:37   来源:  www.papawere.com   评论:0 点击:

操場埋尸案維持原判央視離正義又近了一步死刑正當程序2020年1月10日,湖南省高级人民法院对杜少平等人故意

  2020年1月10日,湖南省高级人民法院对杜少平等人故意杀人案及其恶势力犯罪集团案件进行二审宣判,依法裁定驳回杜少平、罗光忠等8名被告人的上诉,全案维持原判,核准对罗光忠的死缓判决,对杜少平的死刑判决依法报请最高人民法院核准。

On January 10,2020, the Higher People's Court of Hunan Province pronounced a second instance judgment on the case of intentional homicide of du Shao-equality persons and their criminal group of evil forces, and ruled in accordance with the law to reject the appeal of du Shao-ping and Luo Guangzhong and other eight defendants.

  这样的结果,毫无意外。对于杜少平、罗光忠来说,他们的命运早在2001年1月杀害邓世平并埋尸于新晃一中操场时即已注定。“连电视剧都不敢这么演!”这道出了公众的震惊和愤怒。如今,距离案发已经过去17年,让正义尽早到来,是公众的心愿。

Such an outcome is no surprise. For du shaoping and luo guangzhong, their fate was doomed when they killed deng in january 2001 and buried their bodies in the playground of xinshang yi middle school. \"Not even the TV series!\" This speaks of public shock and anger. Now,17 years after the crime, it is the public's wish to bring justice as soon as possible.

  我们看到办案机关对公众期待的回应。本案一审判决是2019年12月18日。按照刑事诉讼法规定,被告人不服判决提出上诉的期限是10日,从接到判决书的第二日起算。这样算下来,上诉期满,时间已是去年年底。湖南高院二审开庭审理本案的时间是今年1月6日,距离上诉期满不过一周时间。这样的办案效率令人称道,而高效率背后办案人员的艰苦付出也不难想象。

We see the response of the authorities to public expectations. The first instance judgment in this case is December 18,2019. According to the Code of Criminal Procedure, the time limit for the defendant to appeal against the judgement is 10 days, counting from the second day of receipt of the judgement. As such, the appeal expires at the end of last year. The second instance of the Hunan High Court heard the case on January 6, less than a week after the appeal expired. Such efficiency is admirable, and it is not hard to imagine the hard work of the people behind it.

  我们也看到办案机关对正当程序的坚守,对上诉人权益的保障。一个人,哪怕他罪大恶极,仍有权得到公正审判,这是程序正义的要求。在有些人看来,既然案件结果无从改变,上诉期限长几天短几天,二审是否开庭审理,似乎不那么重要。这种漠视正当程序的观点极其有害,既然法律规定了上诉期限,那就一天也不能少;既然法律规定了被告人被判处死刑的上诉案件应当开庭审理,也就没有不开庭的道理。就本案而言,办案机关对程序正义的坚守,并不能改变案件的最终结果,却可以让被告人在面对法律对其命运的裁判时心服口服。

We also see the adherence of the authorities to due process and the protection of the rights and interests of the appellants. It is the demand of procedural justice that a man is entitled to a fair trial, even if he is the worst of sin. In some people's view, since the outcome of the case could not be changed, the duration of the appeal was several days short, and the opening of the second instance seemed less important. This view of disregard for due process is extremely harmful, and since the time limit for appeal is established by law, it cannot be less than a day; since the law provides that the case of an appeal against the death penalty for the accused should be heard in court, there is no reason not to sit. In this case, the adherence of the authorities to procedural justice cannot change the final outcome of the case, but can convince the accused to face the judgment of his fate.

  杜少平的死刑判决将报请最高人民法院核准,审判已走到最后阶段,核准后就只剩执行程序。被害人邓世平的正义,就要来了。(特约评论员李曙明)

Du Shaoping's death sentence will be submitted to the Supreme People's Court for approval. The justice of the victim, Deng Siping, is coming. (Special commentator Lee Shu-ming)


相关热词搜索:

上一篇:每经22点丨王毅同法国外长勒德里昂通电话,中法外长反对使用武力
下一篇:没有了

分享到: